Religion Today

Thursday, August 01, 2013

What would a Biblical America be Like?

In many of the recent moral debates in the United States of America, we have heard people call for a return to a more biblical America. With regard to many difficult issues, such as gays, abortion and marriage, some individuals argue that our society should simply “do what the Bible says.”
One problem with a call for a return to biblical principles on these matters is that the Bible does not speak directly about these questions. Scripture never even imagines the possibility of abortion, for example, although its passages about killing can form the basis of different theological positions about it.
But there are many topics on which the Bible is quite explicit, however, and if we wanted to create a biblical America, there are ample guidelines available. What would a biblical America be like?  Let us imagine.
Political system: The only political system in Scripture is that of a king or an emperor. For Scripture, the only question is whether the king is native to the country or an outsider who conquered the country. In the case of the latter, Jesus did not counsel rebellion, but to “turn the other cheek,” and to “pay unto Caesar what is Caesar’s” (i.e., taxes) without complaint. The idea that a government could be democratic or that people should elect their rulers is antithetical to biblical ideas of goverance.
Economic system: The Bible clearly forbids the taking of interest when loaning money. Since interest-based financing is one of the driving forces of a capitalist economy, we would need to scrap the very economic system that has generated this country’s wealth. No loaning on interest would also prevent borrowing money for a mortgage. To buy a home, you would have to save up the entire purchase price.
Slavery: Neither the New Testament nor the Old see anything wrong with slavery. Indeed, the apostle Paul counsels his enslaved readers that they should accept their slavery as God’s will. This is not a race-based slavery, but one in which anyone can become a slave, either through poverty or military defeat. There is even a temporary form of slavery for the poor. In debt? Can’t pay your bills? Sell yourself (or your children) into slavery for seven years.
Women: A woman’s place is in the home, not in the workplace. Women should not play any role in public society. They should not have a job outside the home, nor should they speak in church, let alone teach Sunday School or become ministers. Men would have to fill all the jobs that women now occupy. Children would stay home under their mothers’ care; no more daycare. Since women would never function outside the home, there would be no need for education.
Sons: A son’s duty is to obey and respect his father and mother. If he doesn’t, he should be punished by death.
Clothing styles: Cross-dressing is “right out.” Neither men nor women can wear clothing designed for the opposite sex. Only men can wear the pants in the family.
Worship: Religion, including its theology and beliefs, would be closely linked to the national government. Under the kings of Israel, there was one official religion. It was supported not only by a central priesthood, but also by the power of the king and his army. When Israel was controlled by foreign powers, that centralized religion became the expression of national identity, and rampant nationalism replaced government as the driving force of conformity. In this biblical America, then, there would be one religion (Episcopal? Catholic? Baptist? Mormon?). Freedom of religion would be non-existent.
So, what do you think? Should we make American society more in line with biblical principles? 

Labels: , , , , , , , ,


  • You do rightfully point out that we cannot very well seek for literal truth in the bible and wish to maintain our modern lifestyle. This is no small matter because the biblical changes to lifestyle would cut right down to our constitutional rights, and the constitution and biblical lifestyle would be irreconcilable at the literal level.

    I do not know why you exempted abortion from the literal messages we could take from the bible because the bible does give us quite literal examples to follow:
    Life at large is not valued much in the bible, there is too much vengeful killing, even by the alleged god himself. And the old testament is full of killing of children, including the cutting out of the unborns of your enemy. so what is the problem? Abortion is approved of in general and even encouraged under certain circumstances, albeit in a beastly and inhumane way.

    Clearly, literal belief is ludicrous. The problem then is, if we ought to let go of literal belief, is there anything left at all? If interpretation is not just allowed but is necessary, where to stop? Right to the point: Does the bible talk about an actual god or just about an abstract concept? Is god a metaphor?

    Young Gandalf

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8/02/2013  

  • I don't think society would survive in a biblical world. Society has advanced too far and would collapse on itself. The economy would collapse because there is not a single person in wall street that can say they live by biblical principles. They are not concerned with "being saved" I often think god why would you put is in such a dark and scary world. but maybe its a test of character.

    By Blogger Samwise Gamgee, at 8/22/2013  

Post a Comment

<< Home