Religion Today

Saturday, August 05, 2006

Mel Gibson and Anti-Semitism

Mel Gibson and Anti-Semitism
Paul V.M. Flesher

During his recent drunk-driving arrest, Mel Gibson not only acted abusively and persistently threatened the arresting officer but also made several anti-semitic remarks. It is odd that there was no reason for anti-semitism during the encounter. Most of Gibson’s recorded comments constitute threats of retaliation against the officer or exclamations about how the arrest will hurt his career, both of which fit the circumstance. But Gibson’s anti-semitic comments come out of nowhere. Although the arresting officer happened to be Jewish, Gibson did not know this until after he began his anti-Jewish tirade.

From the arrest report, it is clear that the officer has often arrested belligerent drunks, and most of Gibson’s ravings go unheeded. But when Gibson begins to curse the Jews, the officer gets scared and takes steps to protect himself from potential violence. This incident provides a good example of anti-semitism’s power to generate fear in the people it targets. Indeed, this power has produced not only fear but injury and death to Jews for centuries. To understand why anti-semitic threats would frighten an armed policeman arresting an unarmed man, let us review anti-semitism’s history.

Anti-semitism originated within Christianity. Its roots stem from the period when early Christians were debating whether or not Christianity belonged to Judaism. In the beginning, Jesus and his followers saw themselves as Jews and as fulfilling Jewish prophecies. After Jesus’ death, the church was headquartered in Jerusalem, where Judaism’s central temple was located, and where many Christians continued to worship. When the Apostle Paul successfully argued that new Christians should not be circumcised or follow other Jewish practices, such as dietary rules, Judaism rejected Christianity. Christianity saw this rejection as a betrayal and many angry words were said and written on both sides. Some of these words were preserved in the New Testament, and hence carried on into later Christianity.

By the early medieval period in Europe, Christianity had developed the notion that all Jews throughout history were responsible for killing the messiah, even though Jesus’ crucifixion had happened as a single, one-time event where no more than a couple hundred Jews could have been present. This was forgivable if the Jews converted to Christianity. But Jews as a whole did not convert. Since Christian theology had no place for unconverted Jews, Jews living in Europe became objects of hatred and largely without the legal rights accorded to Christians; they had no place in Christian society. Over the centuries, Jews were ejected from England and Spain, were persecuted and killed en masse during the Crusades, and often forced to live in ghettoes. Given their lack of legal protections, Jews were often accused of crimes by those in power, such as kings and dukes, bishops and priests, resulting in attacks and pogroms against entire Jewish communities. (Anti-semitism in the Muslim world differs significantly and will be addressed in a future column.)

As the Enlightenment dethroned Christianity in Europe during the nineteenth century, anti-semitism changed. The charge of killing Jesus no longer resonated in a secular society and gave way to the accusation of a world-wide conspiracy theory that Jews controlled governments, major events, trade, and so on. Since these ideas were not based on evidence, some government organizations manufactured evidence with which to frame Jews, most notoriously, members of the Russian secret service and the French army.

Mel Gibson’s comment to the policeman, “The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world,” expresses this type of anti-semitism. The silliness of this remark exemplifies the entire concept’s thoughtlessness. There are only twelve million or so Jews in the world as against two billion Christians, over a billion Muslims, nearly a billion Hindus, to say nothing of Buddhists, Sikhs, secularists, and many other groups. The notion that such a small group runs everything that all these other groups do is simply preposterous.

What is really going on in such a belief is an attempt by those on top of society, whether ruling classes or individuals who derive power from wealth or celebrity, to present themselves as victims, as persecuted by a secret cabal. This in turn justifies their actions as defensive measures, at least to themselves. Mel Gibson, a man of wealth, accomplishment, and fame, threatened a policeman carrying out his legal duty, saying that the officer’s actions would bring Gibson’s retribution upon him. That Gibson has apologized several times since his arrest indicates his sober awareness of the immoral character of his actions and statements at that time. But the fear which this threats evoked in the officer has a long past.

3 Comments:

  • What historical documents are you utilizing to conclude that a couple hundred Jews were present at the crucifixion? According to the same documents, how many Romans were present?

    By Blogger merks, at 8/14/2006  

  • It is silliness to suggest that there is a secret cabal of Jews running everything and responsible for everything on earth.

    It is equally silly to suggest that Jews are not disproportionately represented in many institutions of cultural formation in the industrialized world, particularly in the culture forming institutions of America, which as the current top dog of a globalizing culture also has disproportionate influce. That Jews are disproportionately represented in the institutions of Film, print media, law, political lobbying (APAC), and general per capita wealth is a fact that we should not take for granted when claims somewhat more sane than Gibson's are made on American attitudes and policy.

    I would also say that the statement "Anti-Semitism began in Christianity" is a bit bald. There is some truth to it, but also there is the simple sociological phenomenon of an insular minority that is successful in many fields living with a majority. It rarely if ever leads to happy conclusions, regional religion notwithstanding.

    By Blogger Roland, at 8/21/2006  

  • What was mentioned earlier, to my past life experiance, nothing in this world happens whit out a reason, two side to al storry. And the other "It is equally silly to suggest that ""That Jews are disproportionately represented in the institutions of Film, print media," Well let just say my life long dream to get work in the instituson of Film, was shadowed by the lack of the right religion.
    Unfortunetley, I can't speek about it,and if I do, will never reach
    the daylight... Roland, thank you
    for your blog.

    By Blogger Gyula, at 8/25/2009  

Post a Comment

<< Home